I scratched the surface of this yesterday when discussing blaming the Giants opening series losses on . I thought that Bruce Bochy made the correct decision in starting Belt at first base and and in the outfield over and .
I wanted to test if my hypothesis was correct so I pulled up the ZIPS hitting projections and my valuation for the defense for the players and did a quick cost/benefit analysis. (This is runs above replacement, with the total for hitting and fielding above rounded to the nearest whole number. I excluded the replacement level addition because I'm assuming even playing time for each player.)
Click for larger view |
I am a little skeptical on the projections for Schierholtz. ZIPS has him as .322 wOBA hitter compared to his career level of .305. Also, ZIPS does not have a favorable opinion of Burrell, giving him a .338 wOBA compared to his career level .361.
I took the liberty of making some adjustments (half way between projected and career level) to move each toward their career levels. The adjustments ended up with Schierholtz having a .313 wOBA and Burrell with a .349 wOBA.
Click for larger view |
The defense may be ugly at times but the current outfield is the best team that the Giants can field in the absence of . If we want to look to platoon splits, it would make sense to give Schierholtz the starts against lefties, as he has mashed them to a tune of a .385 wOBA but the sample isn't huge (only 155 plate appearances). However, it isn't like Burrell struggles against southpaws either. Giving the starts to Schierholtz on days that lefties pitch and using him as a defensive replacement is probably the best bet for optimizing this thing.
If the team wants to give itself the best chance to win games, this is the way to go. Don't let a few fluky plays on defense steer you away from the optimum.
Become a and follow on Twitter. There is lots of good stuff going on there.
No comments:
Post a Comment